Skip to contents

These functions provide different normalized similariy/distance measurements.

Usage

ndotproduct(x, y, m = 0L, n = 0.5, na.rm = TRUE, ...)

dotproduct(x, y, m = 0L, n = 0.5, na.rm = TRUE, ...)

neuclidean(x, y, m = 0L, n = 0.5, na.rm = TRUE, ...)

navdist(x, y, m = 0L, n = 0.5, na.rm = TRUE, ...)

nspectraangle(x, y, m = 0L, n = 0.5, na.rm = TRUE, ...)

Arguments

x

matrix, two-columns e.g. m/z, intensity

y

matrix, two-columns e.g. m/z, intensity

m

numeric, weighting for the first column of x and y (e.g. "mz"), default: 0 means don't weight by the first column. For more details see the ndotproduct details section.

n

numeric, weighting for the second column of x and y (e.g. "intensity"), default: 0.5 means effectly using sqrt(x[,2]) and sqrt(y[,2]). For more details see the ndotproduct details section.

na.rm

logical(1), should NA be removed prior to calculation (default TRUE).

...

ignored.

Value

double(1) value between 0:1, where 0 is completely different and 1 identically.

Details

All functions that calculate normalized similarity/distance measurements are prefixed with a n.

ndotproduct: the normalized dot product is described in Stein and Scott 1994 as: \(NDP = \frac{\sum(W_1 W_2)^2}{\sum(W_1)^2 \sum(W_2)^2}\); where \(W_i = x^m * y^n\), where \(x\) and \(y\) are the m/z and intensity values, respectively. Please note also that \(NDP = NCos^2\); where NCos is the cosine value (i.e. the orthodox normalized dot product) of the intensity vectors as described in Yilmaz et al. 2017. Stein and Scott 1994 empirically determined the optimal exponents as m = 3 and n = 0.6 by analyzing ca. 12000 EI-MS data of 8000 organic compounds in the NIST Mass Spectral Library. MassBank (Horai et al. 2010) uses m = 2 and n = 0.5 for small compounds. In general with increasing values for m, high m/z values will be taken more into account for similarity calculation. Especially when working with small molecules, a value m > 0 can be set to give a weight on the m/z values to accommodate that shared fragments with higher m/z are less likely and will mean that molecules might be more similar. Increasing n will result in a higher importance of the intensity values. Most commonly m = 0 and n = 0.5 are used.

neuclidean: the normalized euclidean distance is described in Stein and Scott 1994 as: \(NED = (1 + \frac{\sum((W_1 - W_2)^2)}{sum((W_2)^2)})^{-1}\); where \(W_i = x^m * y^n\), where \(x\) and \(y\) are the m/z and intensity values, respectively. See the details section about ndotproduct for an explanation how to set m and n.

navdist: the normalized absolute values distance is described in Stein and Scott 1994 as: \(NED = (1 + \frac{\sum(|W_1 - W_2|)}{sum((W_2))})^{-1}\); where \(W_i = x^m * y^n\), where \(x\) and \(y\) are the m/z and intensity values, respectively. See the details section about ndotproduct for an explanation how to set m and n.

nspectraangle: the normalized spectra angle is described in Toprak et al 2014 as: \(NSA = 1 - \frac{2*\cos^{-1}(W_1 \cdot W_2)}{\pi}\); where \(W_i = x^m * y^n\), where \(x\) and \(y\) are the m/z and intensity values, respectively. The weighting was not originally proposed by Toprak et al. 2014. See the details section about ndotproduct for an explanation how to set m and n.

Note

These methods are implemented as described in Stein and Scott 1994 (navdist, ndotproduct, neuclidean) and Toprak et al. 2014 (nspectraangle) but because there is no reference implementation available we are unable to guarantee that the results are identical. Note that the Stein and Scott 1994 normalized dot product method (and by extension ndotproduct) corresponds to the square of the orthodox normalized dot product (or cosine distance) used also commonly as spectrum similarity measure (Yilmaz et al. 2017). Please see also the corresponding discussion at the github pull request linked below. If you find any problems or reference implementation please open an issue at https://github.com/rformassspectrometry/MsCoreUtils/issues.

References

Stein, S. E., and Scott, D. R. (1994). Optimization and testing of mass spectral library search algorithms for compound identification. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 5(9), 859--866. doi:10.1016/1044-0305(94)87009-8 .

Yilmaz, S., Vandermarliere, E., and Lennart Martens (2017). Methods to Calculate Spectrum Similarity. In S. Keerthikumar and S. Mathivanan (eds.), Proteome Bioinformatics: Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 1549 (pp. 81). doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-6740-7_7 .

Horai et al. (2010). MassBank: a public repository for sharing mass spectral data for life sciences. Journal of mass spectrometry, 45(7), 703--714. doi:10.1002/jms.1777 .

Toprak et al. (2014). Conserved peptide fragmentation as a benchmarking tool for mass spectrometers and a discriminating feature for targeted proteomics. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics : MCP, 13(8), 2056--2071. doi:10.1074/mcp.O113.036475 .

Pull Request for these distance/similarity measurements: https://github.com/rformassspectrometry/MsCoreUtils/pull/33

See also

Other distance/similarity functions: gnps()

Author

navdist, neuclidean, nspectraangle: Sebastian Gibb

ndotproduct: Sebastian Gibb and Thomas Naake, thomasnaake@googlemail.com

Examples


x <- matrix(c(1:5, 1:5), ncol = 2, dimnames = list(c(), c("mz", "intensity")))
y <- matrix(c(1:5, 5:1), ncol = 2, dimnames = list(c(), c("mz", "intensity")))

ndotproduct(x, y)
#> [1] 0.7660906
ndotproduct(x, y, m = 2, n = 0.5)
#> [1] 0.9074293
ndotproduct(x, y, m = 3, n = 0.6)
#> [1] 0.9127553

neuclidean(x, y)
#> [1] 0.8003406

navdist(x, y)
#> [1] 0.6970151

nspectraangle(x, y)
#> [1] 0.5556013